Comment and analysis on all things Charlotte

How dangerous is coal ash?

The answer, as the Greensboro News & Record reports, is “it depends.” A sample quote:

If coal ash were a person, it would need a really good psychiatrist to treat a classic case of schizophrenia.

Is this power-plant byproduct the “toxic sludge” so threatening to the state’s ground water, streams and lakes?

Or is it the potentially beneficial substance Charlotte coal ash expert John Daniels works with in a quest to recycle more of it in roads, buildings and other uses?

“It’s important to remember that 99 percent of this material is just like soil,” said Daniels, an associate professor of civil engineering at UNC-Charlotte. “It’s that 1 percent that gives it the bad name, but really you can have regular dirt that is just as bad.”

and:

The stuff is, indeed, potentially harmful in the massive quantities it has been stored up by Duke Energy and other power companies around the nation.

“The difference between a poison and a remedy is the dose,” said Daniels, who is among a team of coal ash researchers at UNC-Charlotte. “Let’s keep the actual risk in perspective.”

You can read the rest of the story here.

One Response to “How dangerous is coal ash?”

  • Jun
    10
    2014

    Some power company justified costs to achieve monopoly and produced toxic results. The only thing left is changing “polluting” to “investing” – then it’s apparent that power cos are investing in NC just like BP is “investing” in America!

    and the pathetic irony… if only arguing marijuana’s toxicity was a one percent issue (and therefore tolerable), then we wouldn’t have to hear about NC’s fracking economic growth and opt instead for individuals bringing economic growth by their own luck and pluck.

    Ha, coupling NC with individual responsibility, I just caught myself being idiotic and now feel qualified for one of their valuable college degrees.

JLF Network Websites & Blogs